Who is Robert Helfend and what is his background in criminal defense?
Robert Helfend is a Los Angeles-based criminal defense attorney who has been practicing since 1984. Over his four-decade career, he has handled more than 4,000 criminal cases, including serious charges such as murder and federal crimes. His extensive courtroom experience gives him unique insight into how the criminal justice system really works beyond what people see on television.
Why did Robert Helfend choose to practice criminal defense law?
Robert Helfend explained that he was drawn to criminal defense because of the challenge and unpredictability of the courtroom. He emphasized that criminal law requires attorneys to think quickly on their feet, adapt to constantly changing circumstances, and fight for clients whose lives are often at stake. For him, the ability to protect constitutional rights and provide a strong defense is both a professional responsibility and a passion.
What is the difference between truth and evidence in a murder trial?
According to Robert Helfend, trials are not about “truth” in the way the public often assumes—they are about evidence. Jurors can only consider the evidence presented in court, regardless of whether or not it represents the full truth of what happened. Winning a murder case means ensuring that the jury understands reasonable doubt and evaluates only admissible evidence, not speculation or outside assumptions.
How important is jury selection in a criminal defense case?
Robert Helfend highlighted jury selection as one of the most critical stages in any murder defense. He noted that understanding juror biases, backgrounds, and experiences can make or break a case. The defense must carefully evaluate whether potential jurors can remain fair and impartial, especially in high-stakes cases involving violent crimes.
What do television shows get wrong about murder trials?
Robert Helfend pointed out that TV dramas like Law & Order often create unrealistic expectations about criminal defense. On television, cases are wrapped up neatly within an hour, but in reality, murder trials can take years to reach court. TV also exaggerates the role of surprise witnesses and last-minute revelations, whereas real cases involve months of preparation, pretrial motions, and careful presentation of evidence.
How long does a murder case usually take in real life?
Unlike television depictions, Robert Helfend explained that murder cases often take two to three years before going to trial. This timeline includes investigation, discovery, motion hearings, and preparation. Both the defense and prosecution require significant time to build their cases, which means families must be prepared for a lengthy and emotionally draining process.
What role does forensic evidence, such as DNA, play in criminal trials?
Robert Helfend emphasized that while forensic evidence like DNA can be powerful, it is not always as definitive as people believe. The reality is that not every case has usable DNA or forensic testing, and even when it does, interpretation can vary. Forensic evidence is just one piece of a much larger puzzle that includes witness testimony, police reports, and expert opinions.
Why do most criminal cases settle instead of going to trial?
According to Robert Helfend, most criminal cases resolve through plea agreements rather than jury trials. Trials are unpredictable, expensive, and time-consuming. By negotiating, defendants can often receive reduced charges, lesser sentences, or alternative options such as diversion programs, especially when mitigating factors exist.
What should families do if a loved one is arrested for homicide?
Robert Helfend advised that families should remain calm and avoid making public statements. The most important step is to immediately secure experienced legal representation. He cautioned that defendants should never speak to police or investigators without a lawyer present, as anything they say can and will be used against them. Early legal intervention can make a significant difference in the outcome of the case.
What are some alternatives to prison in homicide-related cases?
Robert Helfend explained that depending on the circumstances, there may be alternatives such as reducing charges, seeking mental health diversion programs, or presenting mitigating evidence that convinces prosecutors or judges to consider alternatives to lengthy prison terms. While not available in every case, these strategies can sometimes help defendants avoid the harshest penalties.
What is the key takeaway from this episode?
Robert Helfend’s main message was that the criminal justice system is far more complex than what people see on television. Murder trials are not about drama and surprise but about methodical preparation, evidence, and strategy. Families and defendants must understand that silence, patience, and experienced legal guidance are critical when facing serious criminal charges.
"Robert Is the Man"
Robert is the man! Saved me from a potential disaster scenario. Good attorneys are hard to come by, he is my Sal Goodman!
Browse Similar Topics
- Strangulation in Domestic Violence Cases: When Does It Become Attempted Murder?
- What Is the Statute of Limitations For Murder in California?
- Los Angeles Attorney Robert M. Helfend Secures ‘Not Guilty’ Verdict in ‘Stand Your Ground’ Murder Case
- Conspiracy to Commit Murder (PC 182) – What You Need to Know
- What Does ‘Accessory to Murder’ Mean?
- California’s ‘Attempted Murder’ Laws – What You Need to Know
- Is It Murder To Kill Someone In Self Defense?
- California’s Felony Murder Rule – What You Need to Know





